When was Pico Digital founded?

Pico Digital was founded in 1962.

Where is Pico Digital located?

Pico Digital is headquartered in San Diego, United States.

How many employees does Pico Digital have?

As of Jul 31, 2026, the latest employee count at Pico Digital is 23.

Where does Pico Digital rank among its competitors?

Pico Digital ranks 37th amongst 86 active competitors, of which 5 are funded. It stands 11th in terms of total funding among its competitors. The most recent competitor to raise funding was Dejero, which secured $20M in Dec, 2025.

Who are the top competitors of Pico Digital?

Pico Digital's top competitors include Zixi, Dejero and Blonder Tongue. Among them, Dejero secured the most recent funding round in December, 2025.

Pico Digital - 2026 Company Profile, Team & Competitors

Company Details

DNS redirection services ensuring seamless website transitions and optimized user experience. The company specializes in HTTP redirection, a method for seamlessly guiding visitors from one URL to another. This is crucial for various scenarios, including page migrations, domain changes, and URL shortening. Redirection ensures users find the content they seek, even after website restructuring. Load balancing is another key application, distributing traffic across multiple servers for optimal performance. This technology is fundamental for maintaining website accessibility, improving user experience, and optimizing server load. It is a B2B tech service, offering a critical component for website management and online infrastructure.

Website: picodigital.com
Social

Key Metrics

Founded Year

1962

Location

San Diego, United States

Stage

Acqui-Hired

Ranked

37^th among 86 active competitors

Employee Count

23 as on Jul 31, 2026

Similar Companies

Zixi & 105 more

View Pico Digital's full profile

Pico Digital has not raised any funding rounds yet.

Pico Digital's employee count trend

Pico Digital has 23 employees as of Jul 26. Here is Pico Digital's employee count trend over the years:

Uncover Pico Digital's growth story! Sign up today!

Access Tracxn on any website

Our Google Chrome extension lets you view company details while browsing their websites

Install Tracxn Extension

Top competitors of Pico Digital include Zixi, Dejero and Blonder Tongue. Here is the list of Top 10 competitors of Pico Digital, ranked by Tracxn score:

Rank	Company Details	Short Description	Total Funding	Investors	Tracxn Score
1st	Zixi 2006, Waltham (United States), Acquired	Cloud-based HD video content distribution solutions provider	$7.2M	Schooner Capital, 20/20 HealthCare Partners ... & 2 others	64/100
2nd	Dejero 2008, Waterloo (Canada), Series C	Technology solutions provider for broadcasting	$87.8M	Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, BEST Funds ... & 11 others	63/100
3rd	Blonder Tongue 1950, Old Bridge (United States), Public	Innovative video solutions for content delivery, encoding, transcoding, and distribution	-	-	54/100
4th	make.tv 2007, Cologne (Germany), Acquired	Live video acquisition and management platform	$12.9M	HTGF, Voyager Capital & 7 others	48/100
5th	Comcast Technology Solutions 1994, Denver (United States), Unfunded	Provider of technology solutions for video, media, communications, and data applications	-	-	46/100
6th	TAG V S 2008, Paris (France), Unfunded	IP monitoring and multiviewer system	-	-	45/100
7th	Freedocast 2008, Atlanta (United States), Unfunded	Live video broadcasting social networking app	-	-	45/100
8th	Omnistream 2017, Ramat Hasharon (Israel), Funding Raised	Real-time broadcasting software	-	EIC Fund, Europa & 1 others	44/100
9th	Artel 1981, Westford (United States), Acquired	Media transport solutions for IP networks	-	Boston Harbor Capital	44/100
10th	Signiant 2000, Lexington (United States), Early Stage	Fast, secure file transfer software powering seamless content exchange	$10M	North Bridge Venture Partners, McLean Watson Venture Capital ... & 5 others	44/100
37th	Pico Digital 1962, San Diego (United States), Acqui-Hired	DNS redirection services ensuring seamless website transitions and optimized user experience	-	-	28/100